<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overriding Flash player 60fps limit in Firefox (up to 950fps, as Silverlight 2 in bubblemark)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tekool.net/blog/2008/05/27/overriding-flash-player-60fps-limit-in-firefox-up-to-950fps-as-silverlight-2-in-bubblemark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tekool.net/blog/2008/05/27/overriding-flash-player-60fps-limit-in-firefox-up-to-950fps-as-silverlight-2-in-bubblemark/</link>
	<description>Flash, Flex, Air, Actionscript, Javascript, Silverlight, Mobile</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:50:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tekool</title>
		<link>http://www.tekool.net/blog/2008/05/27/overriding-flash-player-60fps-limit-in-firefox-up-to-950fps-as-silverlight-2-in-bubblemark/#comment-1494</link>
		<dc:creator>Tekool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tekool.net/blog/2008/05/27/overriding-flash-player-60fps-limit-in-firefox-up-to-950fps-as-silverlight-2-in-bubblemark/#comment-1494</guid>
		<description>Wld, what we discuss here is why using the BubbleMark as a reference is not a good way to evaluate which plug-in performs the best. It&#039;s only a technical discussion. Most of us are agree with you on the absolute non-sense of trying to reach 950fps. It&#039;s only a technical benchmark, I hope that anybody never use this trick to push an app online. It&#039;s not good for global energy consumption nor Flash notoriety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wld, what we discuss here is why using the BubbleMark as a reference is not a good way to evaluate which plug-in performs the best. It&#8217;s only a technical discussion. Most of us are agree with you on the absolute non-sense of trying to reach 950fps. It&#8217;s only a technical benchmark, I hope that anybody never use this trick to push an app online. It&#8217;s not good for global energy consumption nor Flash notoriety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wld</title>
		<link>http://www.tekool.net/blog/2008/05/27/overriding-flash-player-60fps-limit-in-firefox-up-to-950fps-as-silverlight-2-in-bubblemark/#comment-1493</link>
		<dc:creator>wld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tekool.net/blog/2008/05/27/overriding-flash-player-60fps-limit-in-firefox-up-to-950fps-as-silverlight-2-in-bubblemark/#comment-1493</guid>
		<description>Somebody, stop that crazy banner designers! On core2 3.16GHZ with full-hd screen 2-3 banner use 100%cpu, even mediaplayer stops !
Can You think about web-pages usability versus &quot;good frame rate&quot; inside those annoing banners ?
It&#039;s absolute nonsens, that modern PC can not play movie on one display, whyle on the other opened some flash-game !
Please, limit your flash-apps to 12-30 fps, who has a display with 950 fps ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody, stop that crazy banner designers! On core2 3.16GHZ with full-hd screen 2-3 banner use 100%cpu, even mediaplayer stops !<br />
Can You think about web-pages usability versus &#8220;good frame rate&#8221; inside those annoing banners ?<br />
It&#8217;s absolute nonsens, that modern PC can not play movie on one display, whyle on the other opened some flash-game !<br />
Please, limit your flash-apps to 12-30 fps, who has a display with 950 fps ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tekool</title>
		<link>http://www.tekool.net/blog/2008/05/27/overriding-flash-player-60fps-limit-in-firefox-up-to-950fps-as-silverlight-2-in-bubblemark/#comment-1207</link>
		<dc:creator>Tekool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 08:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tekool.net/blog/2008/05/27/overriding-flash-player-60fps-limit-in-firefox-up-to-950fps-as-silverlight-2-in-bubblemark/#comment-1207</guid>
		<description>It seems that the new Flash player 10 beta (beta 2 = 10.0.0.525) invalidate the trick I give here to override 60fps speed on Firefox windows. Tinic Uro announces that changes has been made on wmode=transparent, it is probably the cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that the new Flash player 10 beta (beta 2 = 10.0.0.525) invalidate the trick I give here to override 60fps speed on Firefox windows. Tinic Uro announces that changes has been made on wmode=transparent, it is probably the cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.tekool.net/blog/2008/05/27/overriding-flash-player-60fps-limit-in-firefox-up-to-950fps-as-silverlight-2-in-bubblemark/#comment-1206</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tekool.net/blog/2008/05/27/overriding-flash-player-60fps-limit-in-firefox-up-to-950fps-as-silverlight-2-in-bubblemark/#comment-1206</guid>
		<description>Try this test on a G5 and see how horrible the results are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try this test on a G5 and see how horrible the results are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alessandro</title>
		<link>http://www.tekool.net/blog/2008/05/27/overriding-flash-player-60fps-limit-in-firefox-up-to-950fps-as-silverlight-2-in-bubblemark/#comment-1205</link>
		<dc:creator>Alessandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tekool.net/blog/2008/05/27/overriding-flash-player-60fps-limit-in-firefox-up-to-950fps-as-silverlight-2-in-bubblemark/#comment-1205</guid>
		<description>on windows xp sp3:

Explorer 7 &amp; FlahPlayer 10.0.1.218 = 64fps
Firefox 3 &amp; FlashPlayer 9.0.124.0 = ~550fps
Opera 9.5 &amp; FlashPlayer 9.0.124.0 = ~130fps*

* goes up to ~650fps when a menu is open (main or contextual html)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on windows xp sp3:</p>
<p>Explorer 7 &amp; FlahPlayer 10.0.1.218 = 64fps<br />
Firefox 3 &amp; FlashPlayer 9.0.124.0 = ~550fps<br />
Opera 9.5 &amp; FlashPlayer 9.0.124.0 = ~130fps*</p>
<p>* goes up to ~650fps when a menu is open (main or contextual html)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

