<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash only «Modules with PureMVC pipes» demo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tekool.net/blog/2009/08/09/flash-only-modules-with-puremvc-pipes-demo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tekool.net/blog/2009/08/09/flash-only-modules-with-puremvc-pipes-demo/</link>
	<description>Flash, Flex, Air, Actionscript, Javascript, Silverlight, Mobile</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:50:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tekool</title>
		<link>http://www.tekool.net/blog/2009/08/09/flash-only-modules-with-puremvc-pipes-demo/#comment-1475</link>
		<dc:creator>Tekool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tekool.net/blog/2009/08/09/flash-only-modules-with-puremvc-pipes-demo/#comment-1475</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeffrey,

I don&#039;t yet have tested to load Flex 4 modules with this demo. The only thing I know is that removing module is crappy in Flex 3, even with this demo, the garbage collector passes randomly. Something special probably happens with Flex 4 modules. I&#039;m interested in any new informations, let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeffrey,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t yet have tested to load Flex 4 modules with this demo. The only thing I know is that removing module is crappy in Flex 3, even with this demo, the garbage collector passes randomly. Something special probably happens with Flex 4 modules. I&#8217;m interested in any new informations, let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffery Sharp</title>
		<link>http://www.tekool.net/blog/2009/08/09/flash-only-modules-with-puremvc-pipes-demo/#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffery Sharp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 23:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tekool.net/blog/2009/08/09/flash-only-modules-with-puremvc-pipes-demo/#comment-1474</guid>
		<description>Hey thanks for the great code. I just have a quick question. I want to know if you have tried setting this project up in Flash builder 4 and Flash cs5 pro. I&#039;m having a little trouble sorting it all out.

I first created an actionscript project Main in a new project workspace. then I create a Flash file in Flash CS5 Shell.fla and saved it under my project folder and then created the document class for the Shell.as inside my com.project.shell.view.components folder and this created a new Flash Pro Project in Flash Builder.
I changed the output folder in project settings to point to Main project bin-debug. Shell.gets compiled there and then I added a libs folder for my swc&#039;s. 

Thing is my Shell.swc gets put in the same folder as Shell.as. along with another Shell.swf and I,m not sure if debugging is set for Flash builder .  any suggestions ?  thanks again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey thanks for the great code. I just have a quick question. I want to know if you have tried setting this project up in Flash builder 4 and Flash cs5 pro. I&#8217;m having a little trouble sorting it all out.</p>
<p>I first created an actionscript project Main in a new project workspace. then I create a Flash file in Flash CS5 Shell.fla and saved it under my project folder and then created the document class for the Shell.as inside my com.project.shell.view.components folder and this created a new Flash Pro Project in Flash Builder.<br />
I changed the output folder in project settings to point to Main project bin-debug. Shell.gets compiled there and then I added a libs folder for my swc&#8217;s. </p>
<p>Thing is my Shell.swc gets put in the same folder as Shell.as. along with another Shell.swf and I,m not sure if debugging is set for Flash builder .  any suggestions ?  thanks again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sideDoor</title>
		<link>http://www.tekool.net/blog/2009/08/09/flash-only-modules-with-puremvc-pipes-demo/#comment-1420</link>
		<dc:creator>sideDoor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 04:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tekool.net/blog/2009/08/09/flash-only-modules-with-puremvc-pipes-demo/#comment-1420</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for your time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for your time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tekool</title>
		<link>http://www.tekool.net/blog/2009/08/09/flash-only-modules-with-puremvc-pipes-demo/#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>Tekool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 09:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tekool.net/blog/2009/08/09/flash-only-modules-with-puremvc-pipes-demo/#comment-1419</guid>
		<description>Hi SideDoor,

the real document class for the demo is here the PureMVC_FlashModulesAndPipes class. The Shell class is only the view component that instantiate the Shell &quot;module&quot;. The HelloModule follow the same convention. Its base view component class is located in the &quot;view.components&quot; package.

But you can do as you want to. Here the modules were compiled from the same application as I want the application to be compiled from Flex Builder. But in real life you will often have a different application folder for each module. So if you prefer to, in this case just put the document class in the default package, I don&#039;t think this matters.

Now, I will wait for the CS5 suite to be there (only a week left). As Flash CS5 can now supports .SWC files, I will try  to rewrite this demo to be Flash only to get rid of the Flex Builder structure it has. I only hope to be able to generate the &quot;Browse Source Meu&quot; from Flash CS5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi SideDoor,</p>
<p>the real document class for the demo is here the PureMVC_FlashModulesAndPipes class. The Shell class is only the view component that instantiate the Shell &#8220;module&#8221;. The HelloModule follow the same convention. Its base view component class is located in the &#8220;view.components&#8221; package.</p>
<p>But you can do as you want to. Here the modules were compiled from the same application as I want the application to be compiled from Flex Builder. But in real life you will often have a different application folder for each module. So if you prefer to, in this case just put the document class in the default package, I don&#8217;t think this matters.</p>
<p>Now, I will wait for the CS5 suite to be there (only a week left). As Flash CS5 can now supports .SWC files, I will try  to rewrite this demo to be Flash only to get rid of the Flex Builder structure it has. I only hope to be able to generate the &#8220;Browse Source Meu&#8221; from Flash CS5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sideDoor</title>
		<link>http://www.tekool.net/blog/2009/08/09/flash-only-modules-with-puremvc-pipes-demo/#comment-1418</link>
		<dc:creator>sideDoor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 04:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tekool.net/blog/2009/08/09/flash-only-modules-with-puremvc-pipes-demo/#comment-1418</guid>
		<description>Hey Tek,

I&#039;ve returned to look over your code for this demo as I embark on another pureMVC Actionscript 3 project (Flash only)...

My question to you is about application architecture:

In the source for your project posted here, you have the Shell.as Class located in the shell.view.components package.  I&#039;m finding this confusing: I thought that in a Multicore application, the Shell was synonymous with the Document Class, is it not?  Why wouldn&#039;t the Shell exist at the top level of the application?  Is it not technically the daddy of all Document Classes?

Thanks, sd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tek,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve returned to look over your code for this demo as I embark on another pureMVC Actionscript 3 project (Flash only)&#8230;</p>
<p>My question to you is about application architecture:</p>
<p>In the source for your project posted here, you have the Shell.as Class located in the shell.view.components package.  I&#8217;m finding this confusing: I thought that in a Multicore application, the Shell was synonymous with the Document Class, is it not?  Why wouldn&#8217;t the Shell exist at the top level of the application?  Is it not technically the daddy of all Document Classes?</p>
<p>Thanks, sd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

